From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hacksaw Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Bug? Won't eval an 'if' sexp? Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:48:11 -0500 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200301260948.h0Q9mBe1017135@habitrail.home.fools-errant.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043574502 8917 80.91.224.249 (26 Jan 2003 09:48:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 09:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18cjOl-0002JW-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:48:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjQJ-00072Z-07 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjQ7-0006qD-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjPy-0006ec-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjPe-0006Gw-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18cjPe-0005YR-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjOs-0005Kp-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:48:33 -0500 Original-Received: from hacksaw.org ([216.41.5.170] helo=habitrail.home.fools-errant.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18cjOf-0004kO-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from habitrail.home.fools-errant.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h0Q9mCfB017139; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from habitrail.home.fools-errant.com (hacksaw@localhost) id h0Q9mBe1017135; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:48:11 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 08/15/2002 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Jan 2003 10:41:11 +0100." X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4316 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4316 >Whoever gave you the idea it should? You want to use progn here, not Why should lambda not work here? This form, untouched, worked in emacs 20.7. -- When we have nothing to say, it is very hard to say nothing. When we have nothing to do, it is very hard to do nothing. http://www.hacksaw.org -- http://www.privatecircus.com -- KB1FVD