From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al. Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:12:46 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200301231612.h0NGCkG07229@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043339279 17864 80.91.224.249 (23 Jan 2003 16:27:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18bkCq-0004dt-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:27:56 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18bkFA-0000bY-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:30:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18bkCK-0008M2-06 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18bkBH-0007wu-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:26:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18bkB9-0007tQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18bjyD-0002dK-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:12:50 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0NGCkG07229; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:12:46 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Miles Bader X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11005 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11005 > It's easy enough to change Info-fontify-node to be more paranoid, but to > me, the current behavior of `next-property-change' seems wrong in this > case -- I think if there's no property change before (point-max), and > the user passed LIMIT == nil, then it should return nil, regardless of > whether (point-max) is due to narrowing or not. 100% agreement (obviously, for those who've looked at the changelog ;-) Stefan