From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: skeleton.el machinery eats newlines.
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:35:32 -0600 (CST)
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200301110235.UAA27871@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
References: <200301080429.WAA23098@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E18X9PR-0000Dk-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042252605 8154 80.91.224.249 (11 Jan 2003 02:36:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 02:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18XBVr-00027O-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 03:36:43 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18XBcA-0006eq-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 03:43:14 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18XBUu-0006Pz-0F
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:35:45 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18XBUR-00067f-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:35:15 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18XBUF-0005aw-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:35:06 -0500
Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18XBUC-0005RO-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:35:00 -0500
Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108])
	by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA29529;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:34:59 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost)
	by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id UAA27871;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:35:32 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to
	teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E18X9PR-0000Dk-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:21:57 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10646
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10646

Richard Stallman wrote:

   It seems like a bug to me, because I agree with you that the result
   looks bad.  However, I don't know whether the change was intentional.
   If it looks intentional, who made it?

The reason I thought it was intentional was because it already appears
in the first few lines where the newline bug does not occur.  But I
now start to believe again that it actually is a third unrelated
indentation bug.  Unless somebody says it was intentional and explains
why the change was made, I will try to revert things to the Emacs20.7
behavior.

Sincerely,

Luc.