From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recursive load of mule-util.elc Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:59 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200211060107.KAA26465@etlken.m17n.org> References: <20021104082541.D686.LEKTU@terra.es> <20021105114339.0CED.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036545547 1674 80.91.224.249 (6 Nov 2002 01:19:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 01:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 189EqY-0000Qq-00 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:19:06 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 189Eyo-0002gx-00 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:27:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189Eqf-00009E-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:19:13 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189Efx-0003uW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189Efu-0003tL-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189Efu-0003pv-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:08:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id gA617xk27298; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:59 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.3/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id gA617xR26655; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id KAA26465; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:07:59 +0900 (JST) Original-To: lektu@terra.es In-reply-to: <20021105114339.0CED.LEKTU@terra.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:47:18 +0100) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.1.30 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9153 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9153 In article <20021105114339.0CED.LEKTU@terra.es>, Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 08:26:47 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> Uh, what could be causing this error I get now when starting Emacs? >> >> > Loading mule-util... [4 times] >> > Error during redisplay: (error Recursive load c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/international/mule-util.elc c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/international/mule-util.elc c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/international/mule-util.elc c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/international/mule-util.elc c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/international/mule-util.elc c:/bin/emacs/HEAD/lisp/tooltip.elc) >> > Loading mule-util...done [4 times] > I've fixed it by moving `coding-system-eol-type-mnemonic' from > mule-util.el to mule.el, which seems like the simplest and more logical > way, as `coding-system-eol-type' is already there. Still, touching mule > stuff always makes me uneasy... Thank you for the fix. I agree that having coding-system-eol-type-mnemonic in mule.el is better because the following change calls that function always. 2002-11-02 Stefan Monnier * bindings.el (mode-line-change-eol) (mode-line-eol-desc-cache, mode-line-eol-desc): New. (mode-line-mule-info): Use them for the EOL part of the modeline. But, I still don't know why the previous code signals recursive loading error. I can't reproduce the bug even if I revert your change. Is the bug specific to Windows? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org