From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug in ielm: patch. Related problem with end-of-line. Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:55:16 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200209232355.SAA09873@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200209230244.VAA07692@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209232140.QAA09746@eel.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032825449 14479 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 23:57:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17td4y-0003lO-00 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 01:57:28 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17tdlT-00074v-00 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 02:41:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17td4w-0003zW-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17td2q-0003xb-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17td2o-0003xM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17td2n-0003xE-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA08215; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:55:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA09873; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:55:16 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200209232140.QAA09746@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:40:57 -0500 (CDT)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8133 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8133 >From my previous message: If point is at the beginning of a buffer, or after a character with a rear-nonsticky field property, different from the following character's field property, then I believe C-e should move point over the following field, regardless of whether the previous character's field property is `boundary'. I checked that this actually was the behavior in emacs-21.2.90. The problems I described do not occur in 21.2.90. So maybe it might be good to revert to the 21.2.90 behavior. Actually my description of the emacs-21.2.90 behavior here and in some subsequent messages was wrong. The emacs-21.2.90 behavior of C-e with respect to text-properties actually seems identical to the emacs-21.3.50 behavior. I was confused by the fact that in emacs-21.3.50 comint used overlays instead of text properties. That seems to be why the described problem did not occur in 21.2.90, at least not in comint buffers. Sorry for the confusion. Sincerely, Luc.