From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A few questions about occur-mode Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:32:35 -0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020922142753.B387.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020920131146.369D.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032698108 3495 127.0.0.1 (22 Sep 2002 12:35:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17t5x4-0000uF-00 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:35:06 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17t6cr-0006W5-00 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:18:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17t5x5-00020F-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17t5vi-0001wu-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17t5vg-0001wi-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.4.129.129] (helo=tsmtp2.mail.isp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17t5ve-0001wQ-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.153.116.134] ([193.153.116.134]) by tsmtp2.mail.isp (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 tsmtp2 Mar 14 2002 21:29:48) with ESMTP id H2UAVY00.NLZ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:33:34 +0200 Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.06 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8093 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8093 On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:38 -0400 Richard Stallman wrote: > For now, please don't. Ok. Still, it=B4d be useful to give it some though as you suggest. > If we do this, we should do it in all of those modes. This too calls for > more though and study. Ok. My .emacs for now, then. > No particular reason. Wouldn=B4t then be logical to rename them? AFAIK, user functions for a mode FOO are usually FOO-func1, FOO-func2, not FOO-mode-func1, FOO-mode-func2. I don=B4t think changing them would cause trouble, as users are probably using them throug bindings in occur-mode and not directly with M-x. > I don't remember anything about that. Any idea, anyone? Thanks, --=20 Juanma Barranquero