all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu,
	Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE,
	monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:23:36 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209032123.QAA28184@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209031536.KAA27166@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:36:56 -0500 (CDT))

Actually, I thought a little bit about inheritance or
inheritance-mimicking and maybe the main abbrev part of the problem
might be easier than I thought.  The solution I have in mind would
perfectly mimic true inheritance, regardless of whether the internal
implementation could be called "true inheritance".  It would use
pre-abbrev-expand-hook to check whether updating the abbrev-table is
necessary and update it if it is.  It is very similar to what
mailabbrev.el does, but actually simpler.  I am still not sure that
inheritance is really that desirable, but if it is decided that it is,
then I might be willing to implement the main abbrev part of the
problem as long as somebody else would rewrite list-abbrevs and take
care of similar "obvious details".  I have currently no time to do so.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-03 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-02  2:37 Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-02 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-02 23:02   ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-02 23:20     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-02 23:25       ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-02 23:29         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-02 23:46           ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-03  0:26             ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-03  1:21       ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-03  2:08         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-03  2:04       ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-03  2:07         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-03 14:05     ` Kai Großjohann
2002-09-03 15:06       ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-03 15:36         ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-03 21:23           ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2002-09-04  0:01             ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-04  3:28               ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-04  3:49                 ` Miles Bader
2002-09-04 12:31                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-05  2:46               ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-05  4:37                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-08 12:54                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-09  0:14                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-09  1:36                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-09 23:33                         ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-10  0:12                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-09  2:35                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-09 13:49                       ` Miles Bader
2002-09-09 15:25                         ` Kim F. Storm
2002-09-09 18:42                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-10 16:36                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-11  4:30                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-11 20:03                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-09 19:15                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-05 11:07                 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-09-06  1:26                   ` Miles Bader
2002-09-06  2:11                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-06  2:26                       ` Miles Bader
2002-09-06  2:31                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2002-09-06  2:31                       ` Miles Bader
2002-09-06 10:52                       ` Kai Großjohann
2002-09-07  3:16                         ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-06 20:03                     ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-06 15:11                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 14:13   ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-04 16:01     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-03 13:26 ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-03 14:57   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-09-05  2:46     ` Richard Stallman
2002-09-06 16:07       ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209032123.QAA28184@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.