From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toru Tsuneyoshi (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOTE1SBsoQiAbJEJFMBsoQg==?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: improving function "mode-line-unbury-buffer" in bindings.el Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:38:14 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020720.193814.46789542.tune@bg.wakwak.com> References: <200207161329.g6GDTOb22043@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xr8i3emlx.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200207181456.g6IEu5W25120@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027161623 23665 127.0.0.1 (20 Jul 2002 10:40:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vrew-00069a-00 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 12:40:22 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vrrl-0000rs-00 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 12:53:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vre0-0003TW-00; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 06:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: from bg.wakwak.com ([211.132.128.102]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vrd1-0003P2-00; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 06:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (z223.61-115-68.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.68.223]) by bg.wakwak.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/2002-06-28) with ESMTP id g6KAcFGx097555; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:38:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from tune@bg.wakwak.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bg.wakwak.com: Host z223.61-115-68.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.68.223] claimed to be localhost Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200207181456.g6IEu5W25120@aztec.santafe.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.55 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5930 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5930 From: Richard Stallman Subject: Re: improving function "mode-line-unbury-buffer" in bindings.el Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:56:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <200207181456.g6IEu5W25120@aztec.santafe.edu> > What I see in the code of Fother_buffer is that it prefers the buffers > that have been shown in this frame before. However, burying a buffer > removes it from the frame's buffer list (this is a recent bug fix). Do you use emacs of which version? (I use emacs-21.2 downloaded from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/.) Will you tell me how to get emacs of newer vesion or it's reference site? > So as you cycle in this way, the frame's buffer list will empty out > and you will indeed get all the non-hidden buffers. > > - doing bury-buffer once will bury xyz and show *scratch*, and > - doing bury-buffer again will bury *scratch* and show xyz. > > I get *Messages* the third time now. > By the way, for example, if you have only one buffer *Messages*, bury-buffer makes a buffer *scratch*. How about unbury-buffer?