From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toru Tsuneyoshi (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOTE1SBsoQiAbJEJFMBsoQg==?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: improving function "mode-line-unbury-buffer" in bindings.el Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:13:23 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020715.021323.100571771.tune@bg.wakwak.com> References: <20020712.103500.40922275.tune@bg.wakwak.com> <200207141522.g6EFMRW20484@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026667701 30082 127.0.0.1 (14 Jul 2002 17:28:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17TnAS-0007p5-00 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:28:20 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17TnLP-0005fw-00 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:39:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Tmwp-00019Y-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from bg.wakwak.com ([211.132.128.102]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Tmw6-00018r-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:13:30 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (z198.211-19-95.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [211.19.95.198]) by bg.wakwak.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/2002-06-28) with ESMTP id g6EHDNGx001157; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:13:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from tune@bg.wakwak.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bg.wakwak.com: Host z198.211-19-95.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [211.19.95.198] claimed to be localhost Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200207141522.g6EFMRW20484@aztec.santafe.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.55 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5748 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5748 I'm sorry that the explanation may have been insufficient. Somehow, "bury-buffer " doesn't display a buffer which is not displayed still once, when there are several buffers which is displayed before. It is explaned in example 3 of spec of function "bury-buffer" called by "mode-line-bury-buffer" in file "report.txt" which was attached before. When there are buffers "A" (now displayed), "*scratch*" (displayed before), and "*Messages*" (not displayed still once), this function never displays a buffer "*Messages*". But, this function has displayed a buffer which is not displayed still once, when there is only another buffer which is displayed. For example, when there are buffers "*scratch*" (now displayed) and "*Messages*" (not displayed still once), this function has displayed a buffer "*Messages*". While, current mode-line-unbury-buffer has displayed a buffer (or buffers) which is (or are) not displayed still once, at all times. I felt the non-symmetry nature about the behavior of current these two functions. Do you also feel that? I avoid that by my new code. From: Richard Stallman Subject: Re: improving function "mode-line-unbury-buffer" in bindings.el Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:22:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <200207141522.g6EFMRW20484@aztec.santafe.edu> > Could you explain what problem this change is meant to fix? > How is the current behavior of mode-line-unbury-buffer less than ideal? > I cannot figure that out from the code that you sent. > >