From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undocumented change in binding of buffer-local variables? Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:27:04 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207121527.g6CFR4F07662@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200207120138.UAA00495@eel.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026487659 11867 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2002 15:27:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17T2KZ-00035I-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:27:39 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17T2UV-0003xD-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:37:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17T2L7-0001eg-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17T2K1-0001ba-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6CFR4F07662; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:27:04 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5713 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5713 > I found a bug in ielm which I can easily fix and for which I will send > a report and patch soon. However, the best solution depends on > whether or not it is now safe to exit a let-form, binding buffer-local > variables, with a changed current buffer. Yes, Gerd fixed this long-standing bug. It's not in NEWS because it's rather obscure and is considered as a bug-fix, I think. Stefan