From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:24:01 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207101824.g6AIO1x04517@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026325416 4020 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2002 18:23:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org, pot@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il, burton@openprivacy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SM7k-00012j-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:23:36 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17SMGl-0001ZO-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:32:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SM8L-0004yI-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SM7q-0004xW-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6AIO1x04517; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:24:01 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Stallman of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:51:46 MDT." <200207091851.g69IpkZ13895@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5633 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5633 Richard Stallman wrote: > > To avoid confusion, the real release should be .1, not .0. > I'm not sure I follow this. Confusion about what? > People expect a real release to be ".1", and may be surprised by a > release called "22.0" or "21.4.0". I see. I didn't realize that (it is not of course a general rule). If that is currently the rule for Emacs, it should of course be preserved. Jon Cast