From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 20:39:35 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207040139.g641dZ523790@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025749698 22389 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 02:28:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ken Raeburn , Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PwLu-0005p0-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 04:28:14 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PwRh-0002hq-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 04:34:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Pw0l-0000Wr-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 22:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Pvb3-0005mK-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 21:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g641dZ523790; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 20:39:35 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Message from Miles Bader of "Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:35:51 +0900." Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5434 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5434 Miles Bader wrote: > Anyway I don't think it really matters if this convention wasn't > followed strictly a long time ago; it's been followed pretty > consistently for over a decade at least, I'd say, and people > definitely get excited when they hear that an emacs release with a > bumped major version is coming... Exactly. > -Miles Jon Cast