From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jidanni@deadspam.com: modeline doesn't divulge buffer will go bye bye] Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:49:38 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020627084619.35CC.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <871yav79bh.fsf@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025160696 18943 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2002 06:51:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org, alex@emacswiki.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17NT7v-0004vQ-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:51:35 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17NTAP-0007mA-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NT7j-0006g0-00; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 02:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NT66-0006Y8-00; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 02:49:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5R6nZY15812; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:49:35 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5228 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5228 On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:24:22 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > Simply asking a question like that, at exit time, could be a good > idea. One more question at exit won't be terribly annoying, because > exiting is infrequent and often asks several questions. The question > could say "Ask you now about saving buffers that have no files?". I > think that is clear. > > It could do this only if "hand-made" buffers exist, so that in many cases > you won't be asked the question at all. That's similar to setting `buffer-offer-save' to t by default and forcing modes that create temporary, discardable buffers to explicitly set it to nil, isn't it? /L/e/k/t/u