From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Error processing some command line arguments Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:55:33 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020611085501.90C2.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020606183231.E3D9.LEKTU@terra.es> <2427-Fri07Jun2002163007+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023778658 2104 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2002 06:57:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 06:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Hfb0-0000Xi-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17HfyD-0007I2-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:21:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HfaX-0001iM-00; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 02:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HfZ5-0001fk-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 02:55:39 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5B6tXo12643; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:55:33 +0200 Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <2427-Fri07Jun2002163007+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4742 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4742 On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 16:30:07 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > Does it help to replace `bcopy' with `memmove' (after a suitable > change in the argument list)? I tested it and there was no change, but I admit my test weren't very thourough. /L/e/k/t/u