From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: & requires l-value Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:11:17 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020521090847.8B44.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021965115 14307 127.0.0.1 (21 May 2002 07:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 07:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17A3oJ-0003ie-00 for ; Tue, 21 May 2002 09:11:55 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17A42c-0005wj-00 for ; Tue, 21 May 2002 09:26:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17A3od-0003Hr-00; Tue, 21 May 2002 03:12:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17A3nj-0003DL-00 for ; Tue, 21 May 2002 03:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4L7BG907409 for ; Tue, 21 May 2002 09:11:17 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4228 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4228 I'm getting the following error while compiling on Windows with MSVC: w32fns.c(7255) : error C2102: '&' requires l-value The offending line is: lpef->tail = &(XCDR (*lpef->tail)); Perhaps the problem is related to recent changes by Ken Raeburn? /L/e/k/t/u