From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: unify-8859-on-encoding-mode Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 15:33:56 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205202133.g4KLXuI25986@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021930604 32220 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 21:36:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 21:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179upg-0008NZ-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 23:36:44 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179v3o-0001Q8-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 23:51:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179uq0-0006rz-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179un0-0006WG-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g4KLXum14822; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:33:56 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g4KLXuI25986; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:33:56 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4213 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4213 How come unify-8859-on-encoding-mode is not enabled by default? I thought we had decided to enable it.