From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Michael Reilly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL doesn't always recognize rmail-mime-charset-pattern Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 11:13:04 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205201513.g4KFD4G31708@hamm.pajato.com> References: <87vg9knot2.fsf@snail.pool> <3099-Sun19May2002203128+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200205201447.g4KElt625368@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: pmr@pajato.com NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021907757 17109 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 15:15:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 15:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, dvdkhlng@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@etl.go.jp Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179otB-0004Rm-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:15:57 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179p7B-0001Cw-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179otV-0004Mu-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 11:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hamm.pajato.com ([209.113.133.207]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179oqN-0004Eo-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 11:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: (from pmr@localhost) by hamm.pajato.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4KFD4G31708; Mon, 20 May 2002 11:13:04 -0400 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200205201447.g4KElt625368@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 20 May 2002 08:47:55 -0600 (MDT)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4189 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4189 > Just the opposite--it is right for Rmail to read a Babyl file this way, > since they are supposed to be saved as a whole using a single coding system. > The bug is in movemail. If it is to produce a Babyl file, it has to > handle the decoding. That, however, is not practical. > It seems clear that movemail should not convert to Babyl format. > > We are changing Rmail to get rid of Babyl format entirely; when that > change is installed, we will need movemail to output inbox format. It > sounds like we should make this change now, so as to fix the current > bug. I don't think this is correct. I'm using Rmail/mbox and I needed no changes to movemail. -pmr