From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcl-cvs: support "cvs update -C"? Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:52:07 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205201352.g4KDq7927316@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021902843 6923 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 13:54:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179nbv-0001nY-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:54:03 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179nps-0007nr-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 16:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179nc7-0005lK-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 09:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179na5-0005bb-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 09:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4KDq7927316; Mon, 20 May 2002 09:52:07 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4172 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4172 > Would it be useful to support the "cvs update -C" command in pcl-cvs > in some way? (It's not clear to me whether that would be better than > the `U' key that pcl-cvs already has.) I think `U' should use `cvs update -C', but the problem is that it's a "new" feature, so PCL-CVS would have to first check whether it's supported by your cvs executable and blablabla... It didn't seem to be worth bothering, so I've postponed it to when either I'm bored, or enough time has passed that I can assume that all cvs executable support it. Stefan