From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL doesn't always recognize rmail-mime-charset-pattern Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 21:56:42 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205201256.VAA10849@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021899447 1240 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 12:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 12:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dvdkhlng@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179mj9-0000Jt-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 14:57:27 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179mx6-0006Ug-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:11:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179mjP-0008Ny-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179miY-0008MK-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id g4KCuhl05105; Mon, 20 May 2002 21:56:43 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.3/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id g4KCug903185; Mon, 20 May 2002 21:56:43 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id VAA10849; Mon, 20 May 2002 21:56:42 +0900 (JST) Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il In-Reply-To: "eliz@is.elta.co.il"'s message of Sun, 19 May 2002 20:31:28 +0300 User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.1.30 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4169 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4169 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > By contrast, when rmail-convert-to-babyl-format sees an mbox format, > it honors the charset= headers, so the result is correct. > Handa-san, can you tell why does the Babyl branch of > rmail-convert-to-babyl-format use decode-coding-region without ever > looking at the charset= header? It sounds like a bug, since movemail > uses that format. I don't remember. :-( Perhaps, I thought that Babyl format is produced only by rmail, thus, that part should have been already encoded by rmail-file-coding-sysstem or something. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@etl.go.jp