From: Kenichi Handa <handa@etl.go.jp>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, vinicius@cpqd.com.br
Subject: Re: Print eight-bit-* characters with ps-print
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:32:50 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205200032.JAA01545@etlken.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "eliz@is.elta.co.il"'s message of Fri, 17 May 2002 17:21:38 +0300
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
>> Please try to add more delq for eight-bit-* here, and set
>> ps-print-control-characters to `8-bit' (the default is
>> `8-bit-control'). Then all eight-bit-* should be printed in
>> octal form. Isn't it what you want?
> Well, having eight-bit-* characters printed as octal escapes is less
> than optimal. The code I posted does slightly better: it prints them
> in the default font built into the PostScript printer (usually
> Latin-1).
> As I said, this is not 100% correct, but in many cases it matches what
> you see on the screen. And it certainly is nicer than the octal
> escapes.
Ah, I think I see your point. Printing such a character by
octal or a glyph of the same code of ASCII font should be
controlled by ps-print-control-characters. But, in the
latter case, the ASCII font should by the builtin font found
in ps-font-info-database, not what specified in
ps-mule-font-info-database (e.g. "lt1-24-etl.bdf" if
ps-multibyte-buffer is bdf-font). Is that what you mean?
Then, I agree with your change. But, anyway, we must delete
eight-bit-* from `charset' variable because we should avoid
that unnecessary warning "Font for some characters not
found, ..." even if ps-multibyte-buffer is nil.
>> > (Btw, it looks like iso-safe can safely encode eight-bit-* characters.
>> > If that's true, I think we should update its doc string. Handa-san,
>> > can you please comment on this?)
>>
>> This is a difficult part. Currently, as far as I remember
>> all coding-systems encode them as is. They are treated as
>> special bytes that should be written out as is. I'm not
>> sure whether or not we should make iso-safe as an exception.
>> Instead, how about documenting clearly that there's a super
>> rule that any coding system encodes eight-bit-* as is?
> I will look for a proper place, thanks.
Thank you.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@etl.go.jp
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-20 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-20 0:32 Kenichi Handa [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-13 6:23 Print eight-bit-* characters with ps-print Kenichi Handa
2002-05-17 14:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-12 16:31 Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-13 14:19 ` Richard Stallman
2002-05-13 14:19 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205200032.JAA01545@etlken.m17n.org \
--to=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=vinicius@cpqd.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.