From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More Latin-9 input methods? Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:33 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205041502.g44F2Xt01270@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020524628 25790 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2002 15:03:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 15:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17414e-0006hq-00 for ; Sat, 04 May 2002 17:03:48 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1741As-0002Pk-00 for ; Sat, 04 May 2002 17:10:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17414Q-00029e-00; Sat, 04 May 2002 11:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17413S-0001yr-00; Sat, 04 May 2002 11:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g44F2Xk05014; Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:33 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g44F2Xt01270; Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:33 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3583 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3583 Would it be a good idea to create more Latin-9 input methods? For example, Germans are probably switching from Latin-1 to Latin-9, but the german-prefix input method produces Latin-1 characters. I think we should improve input method support for Latin-9, but I think that it would be much simpler to add a flag to make Latin-1 input methods handle Latin-9 instead, rather than making a whole set of alternate input methods. Perhaps unify-8859-on-decoding-mode is that flag.