From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Insert Euro symbol Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:44:58 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205021344.g42Diwb09640@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020347128 30613 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2002 13:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 173Gtk-0007xe-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2002 15:45:28 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 173Gyz-000382-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2002 15:50:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173GtW-0002A8-00; Thu, 02 May 2002 09:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173GtI-00026m-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2002 09:45:00 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g42Diwb09640; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:44:58 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3504 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3504 > Do you think a C-x 9 series of bindings, paralleling C-x 8 but in > Latin-9 instead of Latin-1, would be useful? (What about the poor > Latin-2 folks, though?) I think the answer is that there should be some way to bind a (prefix) key to an input-method. E.g. C-x 8 would be bound to latin-1-prefix or something along the same lines. I don't know how much work would be involved, tho. Also from the C-x 8 example, it seems that just using latin-1-prefix would not be good enough (after all, C-x 8 allows both e' and 'e so it is more like a combination of prefix and postfix). Stefan