From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:37:45 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204291637.g3TGbjW20728@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <86g01i8qoa.fsf@gerd.dnsq.org> <200204272241.g3RMfqI05559@aztec.santafe.edu> <200204290505.g3T55Y806101@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020098398 21679 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2002 16:39:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, gerd@gnu.org, kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Stephen J. Turnbull" Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172EBx-0005dY-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:39:57 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 172EFn-0002GF-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:43:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172EBW-0005db-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172EA1-0005YN-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3TGbjW20728; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:37:45 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Karl Eichwalder Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3414 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3414 > > Sorry, I do not understand what scenario you are criticizing. > Eli and Stefan know about it (the coding cookie trap). Hmm... so it was indeed what you were talking about. Just for the record: it was anything but obvious. Stefan