From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:02:52 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204291302.g3TD2qB19466@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020085452 21297 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2002 13:04:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172ApA-0005XO-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:04:12 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 172Asv-0005io-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:08:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172Aog-0002A1-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172Anu-000282-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3TD2qB19466; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:02:52 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3398 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3398 > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > Look at the code: if there's an LF anywhere, the mac decoding fails > > and reverts to unix style eol. > > Sure. But what you suggest will cause it to revert to DOS style > instead; No, please check again. All I do is that we switch from dos->unix a bit less often. Mac is completely unaffected. Stefan