From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:39:54 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204262039.g3QKdsq31438@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <E170n3M-0000tW-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <1438-Thu25Apr2002222156+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200204261738.g3QHcbl05147@aztec.santafe.edu>  <3028-Fri26Apr2002222232+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019853744 21674 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 20:42:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:42:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rms@gnu.org, gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 171CXw-0005dT-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:42:24 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 171Cak-0002Js-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:45:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171CXn-0000GQ-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:42:15 -0400
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171CVd-00007g-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:40:01 -0400
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3QKdsq31438;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:39:54 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3323
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3323

> > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT)
> > From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> > 
> > it could be that a mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be
> > accepted as DOS-style.
> 
> Are we sure that Mac users (where a single CR is the EOL character)
> won't object this?

Mac users don't have LFs at all so there shouldn't be any ambiguity.
If there is no LFs and some CRs -> Mac.
If all the LFs are preceded with CR -> Dos.
Else -> Unix.


	Stefan