all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:54:45 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204152154.g3FLsjP23687@aztec.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5xbscnb2hh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)

    > I am surprised that the present facilities can't be used more easily.
    > Could you explain WHY you think this is necessary?  Perhaps there
    > is already a better way.

    I'm pretty confiden that there isn't a _better_ way already.

Would you please explain to me why not?
Before I agree that we need a new feature,
I want to make sure we have not overlooked an
existing good solution.  Please show the reasons
why (you believe) these 7 keymaps are the only way.

    E.g. for cua, I need to ensure that those 7 keymaps are in the front
    of minor-mode-map-alist after every command,

The first question is why you need 7 keymaps at all.  Why isn't one
enough?  Why can't one key binding for a given key sequence handle all
the various different circumstances, through conditionals in the code?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-15 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-11 22:56 Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality Kim F. Storm
2002-04-11 22:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-12  9:31   ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-12 13:20     ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-12 18:46       ` Stefan Monnier
     [not found]         ` <5xofgoobzr.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
     [not found]           ` <200204122021.g3CKLh217680@rum.cs.yale.edu>
2002-04-14 22:32             ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-16 20:18               ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-16 22:34                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-18 18:46                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-18 23:07                     ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-19 13:43                       ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-19 15:36                         ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-19 14:46                           ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-21 17:46                             ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-22  9:28                               ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-22 15:15                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-19 18:42                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-19 22:05                         ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-20 17:27                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-21 11:08                             ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-22  7:47                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-22 13:53                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-22 22:36                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-23 10:58                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-22 22:36                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-23 11:02                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-24 17:55                                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-26 13:44                                     ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-27 22:41                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-29  9:17                                         ` Kai Großjohann
2002-04-30  5:18                                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-30 21:25                                             ` Kim F. Storm
2002-05-01  7:14                                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-05-01 17:37                                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-14 23:11         ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-12 18:20     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-12 21:05       ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-12 20:30         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-12 22:08           ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-13 19:05     ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-13 19:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-13 23:30   ` Kim F. Storm
2002-04-15 12:34     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-04-17 16:03       ` Richard Stallman
2002-04-15 21:54     ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-04-15 23:55       ` Kim F. Storm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200204152154.g3FLsjP23687@aztec.santafe.edu \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.