From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Question about copy-region-as-kill
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 06:07:46 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204091207.g39C7kh20370@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <87ofh09xjq.fsf@alice.dynodns.net>
	<200204050602.g3562Dl18586@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<87bscx7rlf.fsf@alice.dynodns.net>
	<200204061732.g36HWSb19584@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<87k7rkmuk0.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <87zo0gbfb2.fsf@emacswiki.org>
	<1018138376.27236.49.camel@space-ghost>
	<87bscwe36t.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> 
	<874rio5ide.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <1018154686.1186.13.camel@space-ghost> 
	<200204072342.g37Ngm020048@aztec.santafe.edu> <1018235691.1186.40.camel@space-ghost>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018356324 11535 127.0.0.1 (9 Apr 2002 12:45:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 12:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16uv00-0002zw-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 14:45:24 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16uvEp-0002IY-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:00:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16uuzo-0004IX-00; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 08:45:12 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16uuPc-0000lz-00; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 08:07:48 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g39C7ka11360;
	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 06:07:46 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g39C7kh20370;
	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 06:07:46 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: walters@verbum.org
In-Reply-To: <1018235691.1186.40.camel@space-ghost> (message from Colin
	Walters on 07 Apr 2002 23:14:51 -0400)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2486
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2486

    > The advantages you see are not real advantages because they are not
    > really differences.  If you like the extent facility it makes no sense
    > for you to dislike the extremely similar overlay facility.

    Extremely similar, except for that all-important duplicable property,
    which would solve my ibuffer problem in a clean way.

Would you please be precise?