From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No doc strings from DOC Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:14:29 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204031914.g33JEUV13067@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <20020403125818.391B.LEKTU@terra.es> <20020403174000.393B.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017867083 17946 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2002 20:51:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16srj1-0004fL-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 22:51:23 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16srvH-0003E1-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 23:04:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16srii-0003Zx-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16sqDI-00040f-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:14:32 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g33JEUV13067; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:14:30 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2360 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2360 > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:10:53 +0200, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > > > C-h f did not show documentation for functions in DOC. > > Err... Just the reverse. Functions whose documentation is in DOC are > shown just fine. But, for example: > > C-h f complete-symbol -> "Wrong type argument, stringp 0" How about a *Backtrace* ? Stefan