From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unify-8859-on-encoding-mode Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:17:04 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204031617.g33GH4w11915@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017850723 26478 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2002 16:18:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16snT8-0006sr-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:18:42 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16snfJ-0005OG-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:31:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16snSX-0005Br-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16snRb-00052l-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:17:07 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g33GH4w11915; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:17:04 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2350 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2350 > JFYI: Eli notified me, that my e-mails are sent with > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > > sometimes: > > --- cut here --- > Btw, Pavel: I was surprised to see this header in your message: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > > (which, of course, means the non-ASCII 0xED character in your name > was interpreted as Latin-9). Is this some side effect of > unify-on-encode, and if so, is this something we should fix, or at > least be aware of, or maybe you don't mind? Clearly it's wrong: assuming that his language environment is setup so that his preferred coding-system is latin-2, when either of latin-1, latin-2 or latin-9 can be used to encode the region, latin-2 should be chosen. Pavel does the same thing happen when writing a file ? E.g. starting with an empty file, enter your name, save the file and check the coding-system used for writing. Stefan