From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug in format-time-string in emacs 21.1? Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:13:19 -0800 (PST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200203140013.g2E0DJu00714@shade.twinsun.com> References: <200203131059.g2DAx1I05506@wijiji.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016064930 13212 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2002 00:15:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16lIu1-0003R0-00 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 01:15:29 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16lIws-0002xe-00 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 01:18:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lItq-0004h1-00; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from alcor.twinsun.com ([198.147.65.9]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lIrw-0004PG-00; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:13:20 -0500 Original-Received: from shade.twinsun.com ([192.54.239.27]) by alcor.twinsun.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g2E0DJPB024708; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:13:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (eggert@localhost) by shade.twinsun.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id g2E0DJu00714; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:13:19 -0800 (PST) Original-To: jasonr@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (jasonr@gnu.org) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:1923 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1923 > From: Jason Rumney > Date: 13 Mar 2002 22:13:33 +0000 > > Is it worth making configure detect when these fail on other systems I don't think it's worth the aggravation. Any such tests would not work with cross-compiles anyway. Your patch looks good (it answered my previous objections). I'll shepherd it into glibc when I get the time. There are a couple of other things to integrate too. I suspect that newer Microsoft platforms support %h, %EX and %OX, as ISO C99 requires them. But it's not critical for Emacs to autoconfigure to such platforms. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel