From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Weird frame/buffer interaction Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:07:57 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200203040407.g2447vJ00502@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <3C7EB0A2.D73F6CD4@boeing.com> <3C7F1FA6.2105F03E@is.elta.co.il> <5x8z9cffs2.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015215321 8078 195.204.10.66 (4 Mar 2002 04:15:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Mar 2002 04:15:21 GMT Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org, michael.p.broida@boeing.com Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16hjse-00026A-00 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 05:15:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hjmZ-0000YS-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hjlW-0000S1-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g24485u26389; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:08:05 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g2447vJ00502; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:07:57 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: <5x8z9cffs2.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1714 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1714 I just tried to create 6 windows on a frame (50x132) with I can't even see the bottom window when I try this, not even with font 5x7. So I can't debug it. But I can answer some questions: Depending on the sequence in which the windows are split, the "magic" resizing of the windows seem to affect all or only some of the windows. So it is might be related to "parent/child" window relationships? Not in a case like this. When all the splittings are vertical, you get one set of equal siblings under a single parent window. Can you make the problem happen using C-x ^? That way you could determine more precisely when the problem happens, so you could get set up such that the next C-x ^ command will produce the problem. That would make it more convenient to step thru and see why it suddenly makes all the windows equal in size. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel