From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Tak Ota Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Command remapping and the delete-frame problem. Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 09:25:06 -0800 (PST) Organization: Sony Electronics Inc. Message-ID: <20020303.092506.01368364.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> References: <5xd6yx965v.fsf_-_@kfs2.cua.dk> <200202232019.g1NKJaY14614@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xr8nb4spk.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015176779 16079 195.204.10.66 (3 Mar 2002 17:32:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2002 17:32:59 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16hZr0-0004BF-00 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 18:32:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hZlI-0002hQ-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail6.fw-bc.sony.com ([160.33.98.73]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hZjX-0002f0-00 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail2.sjc.in.sel.sony.com (mail2.sjc.in.sel.sony.com [43.134.1.111]) by mail6.fw-bc.sony.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA02266; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 17:25:11 GMT Original-Received: by mail2.sjc.in.sel.sony.com id RAA10143; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 17:25:08 GMT Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-Reply-To: <5xr8nb4spk.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> X-Telephone: +1-858-942-3239 X-Fax------: +1-858-942-9142 X-SnailMail: 16450 West Bernardo Drive MZ7205, San Diego, CA 92127-1804 X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.54 on Emacs 21.2.50.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1709 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1709 24 Feb 2002 01:41:11 +0100: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > I have just reworked my original patch for command remapping to use > a `remap' prefix-key for command remapping: > > (define-key map [remap command1] 'command2) > > Please read the updated section in NEWS. I just started rewriting table.el to use the new command remapping mechanism in place of function advising. In that process I came up with a request and a question. 1. Could you add the explanation about the new notation [remap command] for KEY argument in `define-key' document? 2. I tried the new remap notation in 21.1.90 and it was simply ignored without an error therefore condition-case can't test the availability of this feature. There is no (provide 'command-remap) either. How can a program determine the availability of the new feature? I want to leave function advise for the older versions of emacs that does not have command remap feature. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel