From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20020228092109.6CF5.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020227094926.B653.LEKTU@terra.es> <200202280407.g1S47th19198@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014885104 15723 195.204.10.66 (28 Feb 2002 08:31:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2002 08:31:44 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16gLyZ-00045V-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:31:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16gLuL-0008Af-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16gLtL-00089A-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:26:20 -0500 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1S8QIw11935 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:26:18 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200202280407.g1S47th19198@aztec.santafe.edu> X-BkRandomSig-Folder: 3ade7ea7.mb\Emacs\Emacs-Devel\ X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.07 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1625 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1625 On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:07:55 -0700 (MST), Richard Stallman wrote: > The new text would be somewhat longer and that might be inconvenient. If pixels are so scarce, "(IELM on buffer-name)" could be "(IELM:buffer-name)". I bet buffer names aren't usually so large as to make any difference, and IELM buffers usually don't have minor modes active, so there's (relatively) plenty of space. Any more input from other IELM users? /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel