From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: miles@gnu.org, handa@etl.go.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?]
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:13:50 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202262013.g1QKDo516704@aztec.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020225115127.1432A-100000@is> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:56:02 +0200 (IST))
It might be okay to do that inside revert-buffer, but even then I'd
suggest to do it only for the EOL format, not for the base of the coding
system, to keep the possible unintended consequences to a minimum.
Why not do it for both aspects of the coding system, in revert?
That seems right to me.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 7:01 [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 10:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-25 11:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25 7:25 ` Miles Bader
2002-02-25 9:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-02-26 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 22:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 15:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-28 4:08 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 11:58 Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-23 20:19 Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202262013.g1QKDo516704@aztec.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.