From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:43 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202232019.g1NKJht14623@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <200202221137.g1MBbZk02551@kogs46.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014495826 6674 195.204.10.66 (23 Feb 2002 20:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2002 20:23:46 GMT Cc: storm@cua.dk, pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eiht-0001jY-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:23:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eifj-0000Kt-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:21:31 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eie0-00006r-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1NKJku13850; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:46 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1NKJht14623; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:43 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: utcke@kogs1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de In-reply-to: <200202221137.g1MBbZk02551@kogs46.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> (message from Sven Utcke on Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:37:35 +0100 (CET)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1462 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1462 Not in the case to which the sentence above was alluding. There you would have a line FUNC f::x(a,b) { a /?/ b } in the .ylag file, but a line _YLfunc_x__f_(_YLp *a, _YLp *b) The second is an internal artifact of compilation, not part of the source code. Only the first is a real tag. So etags should record only the first one. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel