From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:27:04 -0500 Message-ID: <200202221627.g1MGR4g30403@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200202221502.g1MF2Ye03793@kogs46.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014395517 5386 195.204.10.66 (22 Feb 2002 16:31:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Feb 2002 16:31:57 GMT Cc: pot@gnu.org (Francesco Potorti`), rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIc1-0001Om-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:31:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIaT-00081Q-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIXN-0007jK-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:27:09 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1MGR4g30403; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:27:04 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Sven Utcke Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1429 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1429 > Personally, I do not think we should burden ourselves with this at > all. I certainly would not give a .web file to etags, and _not_ > giving .web files to etags is easily automated :-) So I _believe_ that > the right thing to do would be to create references for all files > given to etags, and to obey #line. So if someone gives a .y and .c > file to etags, it _should_ create duplicate references to the .y file. > > Of course one could optionally have etags remove duplicate entries, or > (maybe even better), if both the .y and .c file are given than etags > could take this as a hint to not obey #line for this particular .c > file, but I believe the best approach for now might be to simply > generate the duplicate references and be done... (eval-when-compile (require 'aol)) (with-aol-mode (complete-agreement)) Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel