From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: including systime.h twice? Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:46:32 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202141246.g1ECkW209357@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013691624 3889 195.204.10.66 (14 Feb 2002 13:00:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2002 13:00:24 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16bLUt-00010d-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:00:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bLJi-0007Rw-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:48:50 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bLHV-0007E7-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:46:33 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1ECkWu24156; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:46:32 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1ECkW209357; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:46:32 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz In-reply-to: (Pavel@Janik.cz) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1133 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1133 in keyboard.c, we include systime.h twice. What about this? I think that the comment before this is useless now so we can remove it completely. Right? -/* Include systime.h after xterm.h to avoid double inclusion of time.h. */ Indeed, the second #include is a no-op, so deleting it would change nothing. However, the comment suggests there was once a reason why it was wrong to do the include any earlier. I checked xterm.h and it no longer has a way to include time.h. So I think the comment is obsolete, there is no bug, and your change is ok. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel