From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:28:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1wzkcubaen.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87fwemnbft.fsf@escher.home> <87wr7yl4os.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328650150 1357 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:29:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10751@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Stephen Berman" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:29:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusb6-00079E-JN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:29:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60387 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusb6-00066m-3U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusb4-00066g-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusb3-0000id-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusb3-0000iZ-2U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusby-0000uT-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10751.13286501893452 (code B ref 10751); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 21:29:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusbk-0000tc-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50441 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusbi-0000tV-SV for 10751@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:47 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusam-0004gy-HK; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:28:48 -0500 X-Spook: genetic PGP doctrine Crowell diwn oil dictionary MIT-LL X-Ran: "H#B/e)e(TK#-oklL\5v?GH!kG0SjhJDjE~Cwewp;|agt$'7Iqvg!13^:y-H4Bt-5g5{{/ X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87wr7yl4os.fsf@escher.home> (Stephen Berman's message of "7 Feb 2012 22:22:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56676 Archived-At: "Stephen Berman" wrote: >> That's the nature of BCC, no? > > Not with an email I sent from Gnus last July; this is how it looks > (aside from the anonymization) in the Gnus Article buffer: Maybe you are talking about a Gnus archived copy (GCC?), which may or may not preserve any BCC field, I don't know. But if you actually send a mail with a BCC header through any kind of mail system and the BCC is still visible at the other end when it arrives, then that's obviously a bug, because the whole point of BCC is that the recipients cannot see it. But having written that I looked it up and apparently there's no guarantee it will work that way. Everything I ever knew is wrong...