From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kelly Dean Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is Elisp's defvar weird? And is eval_sub broken? Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:11:01 +0000 Message-ID: <1qltCjSEEBoLuJohq3kE1ocYjLaBgBtwfZoywxpTbYB@local> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424391176 25992 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2015 00:12:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 01:12:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YObD1-0001b7-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:12:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YObD1-0004hC-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YObCj-0004eS-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:12:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YObCe-0008W3-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:12:25 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:49525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YObCe-0008Vi-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:12:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mfilter30-d.gandi.net (mfilter30-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.161]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23699FB89F; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:12:20 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter30-d.gandi.net Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]) by mfilter30-d.gandi.net (mfilter30-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7HMtpADIU-f; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:12:18 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 66.220.3.179 Original-Received: from localhost (gm179.geneticmail.com [66.220.3.179]) (Authenticated sender: kelly@prtime.org) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0272AFB87F; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:12:17 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4b98:c:538::198 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183310 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > Your code is clearly meant to be inside desktop.el, so it's perfectly > normal to have to add various extra declarations to reproduce some > context before calling internal functions. Should I add the closed-buffer tracker to desktop.el?