From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Operation of format-mode-line Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:39:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1iafkMMowil8pGLPqSPahWeJ5bAl0cAlD1PgXr85e3j8n_C1Rt6gNKY0sAfJrbQofueqeCdmygEW9KeGukPzv3IJBDKrzS6QTMutIUthXjw=@protonmail.com> References: <8734nv11lh.fsf@web.de> <8cfYmJRUfGW8uFnXYZfI_vL7FrTRVG8bLy4Hs7E1gwea6ehe_92Rr2ktAaTRLA-0NEJEcvUals83-xSVjgBQ5Fva41WuyN3HTRM50NjYnfg=@protonmail.com> <87y15ljzyk.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <878qxljt2q.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37580"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Michael Heerdegen , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 28 20:40:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sY8of-0009c6-Uv for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 20:40:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY8o3-0002M7-5Q; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 14:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY8nx-0002Lv-Ux for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 14:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY8nv-0006RY-85 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 14:39:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1722191972; x=1722451172; bh=xdwwOtyAwjCEByKuPzKrdyqmpjJB0fgXR3bNGQJPoyY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=uC/4f66wBofdmRowu1E5K8oatSZWL7ibvuZxZPzbOigvNjXkfPeD11oEclYvPaBQg zYVCYslt2HthdU0lzjLSXMP1wByqYTLDhW3+FDHsFzpjfMm2Zjefzn62jl8wk/o3vx pP1gJ7Ny5MrFct3aGcdEJGb1fAl05Oy2EEtMrTMuNcMsOdKSgKVr8g4upvF/BfCHXg FPBhQMrhgkWDLCdezBEjEhuLuy98dP8pZNl+MND4lW4rnZ2LvZai0F5S8PlSkTHbAn +wiU8/ZEt5fBs74mL6S0DUaTGgyB9R/tDmpl6pcDWoIwpMFpudGoWQxiFpGhRiKw7Y Ar8Ra9okJ8mWA== In-Reply-To: <878qxljt2q.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 8b939566511969aa0c6fee24571abb01e347e9aa Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.132; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40132.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147422 Archived-At: On Monday, July 29th, 2024 at 5:59 AM, Manuel Giraud via Users list for the= GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com writes: >=20 >=20 > [...] >=20 > > If I hardwire the value with '(:eval (vodil-tkbfn-ellipses 13)) things = do work, > > but not when I try to apply a user defined value using a variable via a= function. > >=20 > > This fails > >=20 > > (defun vodil-tkbfn (wmax) > > (setq-default mode-line-buffer-identification > > '(:eval (vodil-tkbfn-ellipses wmax)))) > >=20 > > (vodil-tkbfn 13) >=20 >=20 > It seems that you're onto something. Now go read "(elisp) Backquote" > (or cheat with Chistopher Dimech answer). The former will be more > valuable. > -- > Manuel Giraud Indeed, the Backquote approach was required. This buffer-identification was quite difficult to work with.