From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Le Cuirot Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about pure space Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:56:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1ff71729f661474c8988e4b30f0cc4522cbd18f9.camel@gentoo.org> References: <87il0dqrp7.fsf@gmail.com> <86v84d9rs5.fsf@gnu.org> <86il0ca6ub.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0UvKNT/u1FSVxKZ/2Su3" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12962"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 Cc: Gerd =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6llmann?= , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 21 11:06:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ryT9Y-00036v-6C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:06:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryT99-0004PR-UC; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryT0Q-0001ex-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 04:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryT0O-00040m-ID; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 04:57:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Autocrypt: addr=chewi@gentoo.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 ICwUWAwIBAAIeAQIXgAIZARYhBFKN5r2GkaQ5H9ou Received-SPF: pass client-ip=140.211.166.183; envelope-from=chewi@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:06:02 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317917 Archived-At: --=-0UvKNT/u1FSVxKZ/2Su3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 21:03 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > > Can I ask what the problem with removing unexec is? >=20 > > Just the decision we need to make. It means dropping the MSDOS port > > and also the only kind of build that currently works on old Windows 9X > > systems. Maybe others as well (if there are configurations that still > > don't support pdumper), I don't know. >=20 > The Gentoo ebuild still does --with-dumping=3Dunexec for m68k: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3D8523c3faa98a21e867= 5d70e8fefa3f8a2c16309f >=20 > Not sure if this is still an issue, but apparently it was in 2022. It was suspected that this was an alignment issue, which is very common on m68k. Gentoo has been considering switching m68k to 32-bit alignment to wor= k around such issues. I'll see whether that helps when I get a moment. --=-0UvKNT/u1FSVxKZ/2Su3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJFBAABCAAvFiEEPxcZ3tkwcedKm2a8EiZBXQDdMTcFAmYk1MYRHGNoZXdpQGdl bnRvby5vcmcACgkQEiZBXQDdMTc5EQ//XqL7mPoBHCF8SZ1K3qEeIVvP0xMNf3Le W9jA5C6VJfgr7d1LYNVwhFzbdWS+Qgq2hSNZt0jDTUFbzk0aO2fXZFjWcEIipp7q OIUhqLRaPsUOsdW3c0pXTBD23HJpFayaRLq0OyFwXuUuMZrCE3tnuRt48YcdCeH+ /HxZmhW+1SqcBYpot/mqgpZoyIA5qt2LrL+4BB3zCTgRrNbV68QbvY0BMiM4fjsy QT3ARcQoeIePrNtt3hv0fD5nVyw7UjAv+VuqGUYGOE/RPJMpHxBhwpv+fDJo7gII RXXXP2xBFuk8SMSb2q/ZCzZ3Mfc5cZvHHOfmKgMT5UXYyKqKAhDqUBW2to9zaMBc HZhx5mWX38klk09kbJ1dKdcZ8UReD6XtVHoi8qY/s6gv00HF+RZRtmQBkUKDZi9Q glaCni3PH3Qbunuw1mf28EijPNgVgx74n8l3/pYy5/LdxX17q2/6xpwXRwLKAkIF LLP8V+y1qSUpq+O+/xn19NeIKUzE28DA/buW8Q0Zqa0CmwWceuIG3HG1nzGkksL9 rh2yDTcIPQqZgesba0wxXvoZv6B3mSfz8GX6CGBmlN4vb5xQQv+pjeaVwCt5HMwP +eqvYYrirvuP2mVGeugY4ZRrWc7kbTY9ZD/x8bpa7UIJHBXEQ4RAizTsx9eU7RI0 dR74PEZo0tQ= =LLk3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0UvKNT/u1FSVxKZ/2Su3--