From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49959: 28.0.50; Emacs got quasi freeze Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 09:21:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1fc12f13-1666-d775-f695-f353fd2f8738@gmx.at> References: <87r1f3vv5r.wl-m.nomiya@gmail.com> <8735r3idtj.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <871r6ni8z5.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <824dbfdc-e25a-5884-69a0-e5d4e9bc9d48@gmx.at> <1df6be5b-7041-d70f-1ae7-8e792b8147b5@gmx.at> <87ilzxdqhi.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <87o89nmyfr.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <87mtp78pzk.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <35b2918d-5755-01e0-ecc9-ec543ee83299@gmx.at> <87mtp7f2bm.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <3876ce8f-bbdb-ccbb-815b-c61e4133f1a8@gmx.at> <87czq1vldp.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <87fsuxhx2e.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <877dg580px.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32272"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: m.nomiya@gmail.com, 49959@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 29 09:23:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF9s-0008Em-G1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 09:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF9q-0003PV-C7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF9i-0003Nr-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF9i-0000uT-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF9i-0001W1-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 49959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49959.16302217315735 (code B ref 49959); Sun, 29 Aug 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2021 07:22:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF8s-0001UR-NB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:37031) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKF8p-0001Tu-7Q for 49959@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 03:22:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1630221720; bh=O3poJUaJhKvlcRF9Sb8YqS4BHyAWTVeg2V3HDd+kJf8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Qm73elu/ArJb57liXKXW1bEoqo98uq9glHeQknSegncUILTATEM1dsd8PWTXltKO5 EAyYv/TXNMP/3Sl7TPaSmV2vQedTX7wMSU+GriowtgMXIPDxxDk4UD09jB4L6noG68 tGhxXhIcDEM4EsXL2Ve29vqyKlWt23/BkBZ8HOmI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([213.142.97.35]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mr9Bu-1mpfsk1CAY-00oGzU; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 09:22:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877dg580px.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QOPIZcB6DFPe/YwmqvG4Nfwj1BYfa4kYhPnasKhInfFUkjaVD2M ZmCLL0MGjHv3b+gUErNLm/a3W0FvTHRy2pudWnaJEWeGIQe/go/83Ivrn/H47zXPifkm39s 2sXOgX/Wlj8XfTiosIGDfBP75KhhoSi4YfpyoEv0+A9aZA3JL1uN2PUQ9OVvKVArp/XWWbe aV3zwmaTEldHBgH79cNIA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:gUGqk+77xJQ=:bNrFeax051WfRIaindsmlr ZPiEZ0lITw6Oeq3yfPwX1s7ZIsyOSqCpoGnVtruVNSpzCQkIp6ArVyn2FBXrr60DvZbS5gjhx JxZWpnfJ+Od31PltM8heZrO61Be72ejukJkxwhFUED4v67Iv0YfOwYjw2PFyQCEk6sZlM7Vt+ zKob6XPX61SONneSr2bYNglYyrjdKApBHfDh/d6oaSxN3FPLYtFjRkCeBG5TLuqczM6yL8h/o 2ahAaG3B0d1nAIDeVR93kfbgr7ESruYJ2K+3PWQ2rN5ezi2/6w238VbrUu20CW+ea42zDw9fC Q7taqGow9qtQrzjG5/4BiGmoSx3ZET0aK3WqnJynVmUU8GB6cE7klNNXlZiVmx0ny21CZH/CU Fa3FBpTZUS3ycy9R1iebr3Td+3CIFMtWR+N1rGNhYPtm5vvmaUxoyCuYGhgZez7w5NQxSBA9t baOxalyOa6jmEIWIosD3/ww3SPS0tTjFuHzsYPawpQ8gUebI1Gu136a/iekLHx3JK0X716MSs 50MEO8mu1Lu9g1ow5Ph8vSplNmrry6qRz4s8Cc7vwF18aPWF9eN36VG1cXda5lTekJKt2cISb a4XfT7osvvKNa2+2OBJru+E3rL+fXvr6AxbTgqMga6DrxNZNpyPc4h80nSYOq4GmVkkt5DjLn JTTt6Gahd9d5CjafLVOWiVZlGOnPaXyFkix+2ZVD23M7NDfZENpX7kMtmMvHzzNRr9sIjJmSt OR58Nx3x3cmp78JhCxPDEjeEgMUvAUd4vjp4PwOw7KPbUnmwGi3d2nQsBaTG69kl1cDFY5v0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212918 Archived-At: > RM> - Send me a diff of your "emacs with bug" and your "emacs without bug". Sorry but what I meant here is that you should send me the output of the diff program for the codes, that is the differences when comparing the _code_ of the "emacs without bug" and the _code_ of "emacs with bug". I cannot guess that from here because I cannot simply revert commit 483c5e953c12a95382bef4a3b6769a680c32fe86 here - it gets me a conflict with a later commit. When you send me the differences between the two versions, I hopefully will be able to figure out why they behave differently when run. So please don't _run_ emacs for this purpose but tell me what the static differences between these two versions are. And don't hesitate to ask if this request was unclear again. > RM> I cannot imagine how Emacs can get there without producing any recorded > RM> events before or after it so it would be very interesting to find out > RM> how it got there in the first place. > > This one? > > (gdb) bt > #0 builtin_lisp_symbol (index=0) at lisp.h:1008 > #1 0x0000000000573854 in x_make_frame_visible (f=0x12815e8) at xterm.c:11686 > #2 0x0000000000574044 in x_make_frame_visible_invisible > (f=0x12815e8, visible=true) at xterm.c:11898 > #3 0x000000000043bf11 in Fmake_frame_visible (frame=0x12815ed) at frame.c:2718 > #4 0x000000000068f99d in funcall_subr > (subr=0xe571c0 , numargs=1, args=0x7fffffffa250) > at eval.c:3126 > #5 0x000000000068f47e in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x7fffffffa248) > at eval.c:3051 [...] > #39 0x00000000005b4856 in top_level_2 () at keyboard.c:1126 > #40 0x000000000068af6d in internal_condition_case > (bfun=0x5b4833 , handlers=0x90, hfun=0x5b4100 ) > at eval.c:1478 > #41 0x00000000005b489a in top_level_1 (ignore=0x0) at keyboard.c:1134 > #42 0x000000000068a1c2 in internal_catch > (tag=0xe730, func=0x5b4858 , arg=0x0) at eval.c:1198 > --Type for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- > #43 0x00000000005b478b in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1094 > #44 0x00000000005b3be1 in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:720 > #45 0x00000000005b3deb in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:792 > #46 0x00000000005afea6 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd568) at emacs.c:2310 This one, right. It still leaves me with the mystery that `frame-size-history' does not record a single event whenever you switch desktops. Thanks, martin