From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-syntactic-keywords obsolet? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:20:22 +0300 Message-ID: <1f97bcea-df99-11d5-162e-14053dc852b6@yandex.ru> References: <20160618171249.GA5796@acm.fritz.box> <20160619133143.GA5875@acm.fritz.box> <20160619145934.GC5875@acm.fritz.box> <6bc7b3bc-ddb7-c041-9f68-f8b5faeca63b@yandex.ru> <20160619151836.GE5875@acm.fritz.box> <1d4c62e6-905b-4a51-28b8-e68169fb3269@yandex.ru> <20160619153455.GG5875@acm.fritz.box> <11c988f0-94c0-40dd-b9cd-5a5e27028b63@yandex.ru> <20160619171531.GH5875@acm.fritz.box> <751427e7-f305-7790-99f5-dea230d8e6c4@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466374848 3079 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2016 22:20:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 00:20:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEl55-0003FV-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:20:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40233 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEl51-0001DK-Le for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEl4v-00017e-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:20:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEl4r-0000w4-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:33538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEl4r-0000vz-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r190so7243665wmr.0 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:20:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=coGHTazIzbSm9zKbuj/4m/5fIptJmgZoDxUh52xeNOA=; b=TCF6snV5tw/+nCRpNRNALLcX9lNicFjQinWfp/UqpuqdXWk05qJjli2ayNgCEhYKR2 WRfLUkdcp27ceuUgH9F3zm1H2j0GK0k1GjQaUr6ykAxNqFclaI8yj5JVkUSN/QD252Z4 ETHwgrYIJs9i2pa80EhuYDTl3XpbcZIbeJLb17AfB6QZLUHHPBdjO2phlBVBXCcn/pPz ZOZ0tyNOL0CjIr0Vpu3zGutqmfCXxgfykY5misP4EZ0kzjetmPzefeMAJfRtDywSBMuz 1vMbzkv8MLfT8qQAhklAyOGf1QXdP5mHENiS6fRRzLo8UWKdT02HoTXZA6JY9d/3K4r0 yHww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=coGHTazIzbSm9zKbuj/4m/5fIptJmgZoDxUh52xeNOA=; b=FViKkj3xh8oMaEHBN1Cfawps7XpXENeFv79zMHR9C029fsv6xC5qRR/TYXp5XdFx/j xD7GbFvFeU3VuiFb3oJyu/qNJfhwBPPMYzoqdkKKb/mNRR37UJdjNEvuODfLMZQhj7AP 901PvYBBUsGRFzi0V7aVviG8/W2zVhxByhiWguUPD/NcCZ1EPqlR0qY+/0WcwewzLh3D OyrrXO2Tq5f21b/sup4QUT1Woko9xzGc7P1HT6alOJ81V1VBFCoo3ka3dX+bOeDVEc4f EtLRiKgMUmAc+awJD7NH/lHa8HzF7xMs+8nyzM1v6tDKDX/8YL2Q5eK+gp9p+JYhfoum ixxA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI5spnBVyhIOFtyw/d8KYKHFt6QmN5dZPmAiBXaTDQqVmqPoEP1JVbdeUexE3oEpA== X-Received: by 10.28.20.139 with SMTP id 133mr7676491wmu.35.1466374824716; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.173.135]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm60538412wjm.24.2016.06.19.15.20.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:20:23 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 In-Reply-To: <751427e7-f305-7790-99f5-dea230d8e6c4@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204550 Archived-At: On 06/19/2016 08:55 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: Sorry, > Because just by the virtue of having before/after-change-functions, we > can be sure that a given position is syntax-propertized. ^ can't