From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode 4.69 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:36:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1e1d92fc98145e6b53ca8593e3b4bc3f@science.uva.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTycd-0001fZ-Az for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:04:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTycb-0001eh-Tr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:04:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTycb-0001eO-MM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:04:49 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HTyav-0001jP-MJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:03:05 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HTyDg-0002AL-Un for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:39:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:21, Leo wrote: > I feel this too complicated. First, I don't think it is complicated at all, try it out. I have already gotten used to it: C-S-right to select the right sequence initially. After that, everything works exactly as before. My description sounds complicated because I listed all the commands that are can be used, but you really only need these two. > Isn't it more intuitive and consistent to > make this work like #+CATEGORY and #+ARCHIVE? To be honest, I don't think this makes sense in this case, my suspicion is that you would get many more #+SEQ_TODO lines in a real-life buffer than #+CATEGORY lines. So I think this solution is much more general and workable. Lets see what other people have to say about it. Thanks for the feedback. - Carsten