From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60464: 29.0.60; Regression - pcomplete-arg fails with argument 'last Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 21:51:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1de8c8ce-4aa1-c6e4-1ede-0acafc620a50@gmail.com> References: <87358u5y6l.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <226b32f79f2d431d75b6@heytings.org> <009141ba-c21a-a5cb-a81b-c72a12a26207@daniel-mendler.de> <226b32f79f728e6bfed4@heytings.org> <82cf05e4-3c3f-9804-4801-eb31988f6d7d@daniel-mendler.de> <226b32f79f325daf9c7a@heytings.org> <226b32f79fe1e154cfb4@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16925"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60464@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings , Daniel Mendler , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 04 06:53:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwiI-0004EZ-2Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 06:53:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwi2-0000OH-E2; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwhy-0000O6-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwhy-0006xd-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwhy-0001N1-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 05:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60464 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60464-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60464.16728115455210 (code B ref 60464); Wed, 04 Jan 2023 05:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60464) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2023 05:52:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwhN-0001Lx-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:37863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCwhI-0001Lf-2O for 60464@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:52:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v3so21554921pgh.4 for <60464@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:52:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cpc6BkxUzfbTeAM8aO4VB1zJLAABdH90tAvEpe3TFsg=; b=BlMbIGqVQSheIx8YPzXdfsJHpn6Of0ao8vNO4TimOvUPi+fA58DxG9/DWStV5V8Gab KDh5iBH0nrRVwU3Vo6DCLc56w1uCxG+o3K/qQPvywc87O1okJidhIsXWjl55DnWrFSl2 ljnIC+QKZQnp+/oKmMTZ2w3j5QIqm9em73yT19C16+UCubWB5KmSPWkH3jLRBf/QJZIo jgyXM+Gft843n6ldV3SFw71Vk3ItvNBxMhDUqrjIWNZX1pgT8uoy52cbaTFDk/aNVvDl ywCfkYqtusjhd32iKNo8hT/nUiyLSeNdcq5u1VugdrIlwc5gsRDB+89w5wPGOxTZgm5/ zh4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cpc6BkxUzfbTeAM8aO4VB1zJLAABdH90tAvEpe3TFsg=; b=l+LHCVLLgn+nmNSLtwMnxbYCKSu7V0PP9FgPx1RKSa999cVPeDm0jX+ECEZ36srD4Q Z3RmvJ+gOjyV7WVGAmYCaPsMYAFKGQD9x/Q8GIer8GmCzOEMp1yqR5uL3QY5PzvwejJ0 FBnDK/4J9mmEM9eTr6Kx3kpOod4b4LoamDUi/x85INft9lBUsN01H7jAEhZgRTb3/3r0 XY8F31Epqbz2qkGKDIpB+JdPfN8A3ACYK1dGOT+xtDD8MZQDXV+cwEDuPtDqlfbhR0j+ C7rIThT4x78II3WRjGj1gGMeCTDfTEsf231t9YO05MoFmvW4YvjS8fGRCB1u1MRAjIld flEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koov+KEIIVRS7dwxv1Q3E2curWgfwCljum/tHxGoLC2DDUEjuLr RkOr9EPgYTrvFmD/ajz1sW4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvdTaqZxuddDzz0a0P4MoS6YqUc74rc3EsbjtdLlbvtGktHhaUIyQhR0gDjA5Zi5ZMVP+BVjQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:15d5:b0:581:88a4:9180 with SMTP id o21-20020a056a0015d500b0058188a49180mr39481291pfu.22.1672811533967; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:52:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q9-20020aa79609000000b00582836fb2acsm4591974pfg.150.2023.01.03.21.52.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:52:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <226b32f79fe1e154cfb4@heytings.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:252447 Archived-At: On 1/1/2023 8:59 AM, Gregory Heytings wrote: > Jim, can you also try the patch and report if you see regressions? Thanks. I tried this out for a bit, and I haven't been able to break it yet (although I didn't notice the issue that spawned this bug# the last time either, so it's possible I'm missing some problem this time around, too). I think it would be super-useful to collect some of these test cases for Pcomplete-in-Eshell and write ERT tests for them. Then we can be more confident that future changes to Pcomplete won't regress Eshell. I'll look into doing that in the next week or two.