From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:56:49 -0400 Message-ID: <1cps0u2wbi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87ir7bnm97.fsf@jurta.org> <87absl7sdo.fsf@jurta.org> <87tzqrt8ts.fsf@jurta.org> <87wsvjadfq.fsf@jurta.org> <87d4x9ewfz.fsf@jurta.org> <87fy1wn4ue.fsf@jurta.org> <87lkbn8jc8.fsf@jurta.org> <874piaujgz.fsf@jurta.org> <87veanu8t6.fsf@jurta.org> <878x7issyl.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189193931 4458 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 19:38:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 19:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 21:38:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITjfG-00041B-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:38:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITjfE-0006ix-R4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITjeZ-0006Pj-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITjeY-0006PL-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITjeY-0006PD-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITjeY-0001Bc-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITi4X-0005Cg-I6; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:56:49 -0400 X-Spook: explosion Consul Leuken-Baden CESID covert video X-Ran: iNI:l@7`:"A99>`d=PtJH^Wqc!nVSH8]@ (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:56:34 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78183 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: > Yes, it is for installation reasons, but I'm not sure if moving them > to etc is enough for them to get to installations. If they were in etc, the normal `make install' rule would install them, without any other changes being needed.