On Thursday, December 19, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Bozhidar Batsov <bozhidar@batsov.com (mailto:bozhidar@batsov.com)> writes:
>  
> > Personally I dislike this style, because you’re basically it obscures
> > the semantics of the method arguments, but I acknowledge that I’ve
> > seen it the wild.
> >  
>  
>  
> Ok, that's a -1, then.
>  
> > For me it would be more beneficial if we supported a
> > variant of the style:
> >  
> > methods.each do |method|
> > route_set.add_route(
> > self, {
> > path_info: route.route_compiled,
> > request_method: method,
> > }, route_info: route
> > )
> > end
> >  
>  
>  
> Should work now, with revision 115602.
>  
> > Something that’s not mentioned here, but it’s a bigger problem for the
> > users is probably the fact that we don’t support the following
> > indentation style:
> >  
> > x = if something
> > do_something
> > end
> >  
> > Even if I don’t use and (and the majority of Ruby hackers AFAIK) it’s
> > still fairly popular.
> >  
>  
>  
> It's actually easy to do now, but the old engine doesn't support that
> either. That should be takes as evidence that Emacs Rubyists don't care
> about this variant much (I didn't see it in feature requests either).
>  
> So I'd rather wait for a request from someone who actually would use it.
> If you'd like to add it now, please propose the name of the user option.
>  
>  

I recall seeing StackOverflow questions about this in Emacs, but as I neither practice nor promote this style I’m indifferent to supporting it in Emacs. I do, however, support it in RuboCop (https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/issues/661). If we decide to have it in Emacs we might use a similar name for the config variable - `ruby-end-alignment’ with two options - ‘keword and ‘assignment.