From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Any advantages to recompile Emacs... Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:33:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1C46B6D5-93D6-4367-9ECE-627294AF4799@Web.DE> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232663639 844 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2009 22:33:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Francis Moreau Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 23:35:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQ88l-00083O-Pw for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41787 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ87U-0006UX-DL for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ87D-0006Tf-3J for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ87B-0006TF-E6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57301 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQ87B-0006TC-8w for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:55509) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQ87A-0007fl-TF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9451F94DBC2; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:33:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [91.35.202.165] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LQ879-0000xD-00; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:33:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Sender: Peter_Dyballa@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18WZh6cOMdhMTXvoCIoj5Kz8wCrDCQPPK0vJ2kq 9G4LS8FIpwA6gNlzzrZLfOLiQ8FPFXYpxyomnnubNjayJUFn8c AG899EQWArQEmNcKEBFQ== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:61574 Archived-At: Am 22.01.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Francis Moreau: > Does emacs embed many unicode strings ?? I don't know! 'strings | wc -c' times 4 ... ? >> (And GTK also consumes lots of disk space, look at my GNU Emacs >> 21.3.50 (also GCC 3.3)!) > > Well I have asked to compile emacs without X support, so I don't think > GTK is the culprit. Yes, I read so. I used this as an excuse for 21.3.50's size. -- Greetings Pete If you don't find it in the index, look very carefully through the =20 entire catalogue. =96 Sears, Roebuck, and Co., Consumer's Guide, 1897