From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois-Xavier_Coudert?=" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gfortran error format (was: Re: Emacs and GFortran) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <19c433eb0611030106o62e68648x3827d8a66a52e2dd@mail.gmail.com> References: <19c433eb0611020608v3695ef7ex7cbe998347760d19@mail.gmail.com> <20061103075450.GA2526@acclab.helsinki.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162544824 16810 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2006 09:07:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Richard Stallman" , ams@gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, wt@atmos.colostate.edu, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15437-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 03 10:07:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfv0l-00084U-Um for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:06:53 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 27209 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2006 09:06:35 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 27199 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2006 09:06:34 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:06:32 +0000 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so70809nfc for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:06:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NJzOPbujLPhLf3eb14OMoRTorPQLlbcP5iUX3QYgeulXN+pLdX0CIdVZ1tHFeqQaYdyNLj6kuLKaMJTt0AvcxxC/6iV0xkJlzuKbu+9addev+7QspfkfrMw12frcEqAnVi3XQ3WcrFH58N0u9z/YyapgbHg3n9vMhiXtb64jVjs= Original-Received: by 10.82.142.9 with SMTP id p9mr657499bud.1162544789298; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:06:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.134.5 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 01:06:29 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Erik Edelmann" In-Reply-To: <20061103075450.GA2526@acclab.helsinki.fi> Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15407 gmane.emacs.devel:61676 Archived-At: > We will, sooner or later. But there are 123 other bugs (enhancement > requests not counted) in Bugzilla for Gfortran right now. They need to > be fixed too. We see no reason to give higher priority to this bug > than to the others. To end the discussion, I'll note that Brooks Moses, with approval of Steve Kargl and help from Jerry DeLisle for the testing, commited the change to error.c along with the correct change to the testsuite framework: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00060.html Now, can we get our mailing-list back? :) FX