From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66738: 30.0.50; Gud LLDB regressions Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:32:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1985D138-4723-4744-A1C5-1DC1057AEB4B@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4340"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 10:32:57 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJw-0000wd-4k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:32:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJZ-0006XC-Rd; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJY-0006V9-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJY-00080C-CI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZK2-0002xI-CU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66738.169822277011342 (code B ref 66738); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2023 08:32:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJq-0002ws-9u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]:56534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZJn-0002wf-Tc for 66738@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507a55302e0so7197916e87.0 for <66738@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 01:32:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698222732; x=1698827532; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=A8hQxqHfMFsLWoBQ3PkGfpnYXzUxXMHW6dpiewgpr7M=; b=LPVHIdLjMqhgsabWtSEgoA5Tx6rASyXuXmLw7rYQTPU18vI09rsMS8eIpEOoocpeLI jbML7IbgZlezzt9EVmrNPsb28n4HprwtaxUz3DaaMCX5Wo+o8e++lJoGMHWPn9hfZ5O8 ZJpe08bP1VoU/VS48G8gWgHv0+vzD3P9FmcEinjneTu//dzAwbJvHelkRCA+Xm52R3tF EKhBe9WCE9nt4HYLlGpnnNE9X8PiJ31b1LYVVDmDOvupFU5b8m5hAD+2rPzkDXVXY7hP NTytuYwx6v8jY+M6CSFnoUqmFZt5nb4387/rFKzLXpcRsTvSLHFtDMhjijVe6kx9oz+I 9S1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698222732; x=1698827532; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A8hQxqHfMFsLWoBQ3PkGfpnYXzUxXMHW6dpiewgpr7M=; b=isHuNbV/FKjtJB0bWKmu/XB1jXy8hI0STTHoI2pp1Jdtq9h5fBcO2CQro+WmDMchXC 9P0joMvI8s/kafVRUGlibde4Mc5g9ZOP0rgBnJS+mpTvtZ9+yu8UVXylrPGS52GT8DLz uKzHlB3n7b8gpYvg0RtirM2DnscdPnKKfLR+2wPQkj1Wspa5h//i2P1vD/IVbXjoKYMm Apt51qpVClPmqXpCmwNcVbJ/SaturxdOF20F6XLMnQnZyfz5ubWp2IRVb2n7MQDopLiT QPD1j0MwceGFkyxnHlWz0CmbUvTJI28OO6q5zYZxTjv3HtDkmwy1OboC03WkuGLySstM MDWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywm0zjlBnJHQEt+q3lxUmPHvoENc+LrkMuYoX9SJmV7w5ozqCjV DSvOnWRnLvZ8i3QNNcOdgyI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFX6KKOgndruF1jcOMF2WMAVK/XZ7Sl3viwI5syPMbHkQjCiLYAugl5ddZimxNXtaGkFZWeug== X-Received: by 2002:a19:7509:0:b0:507:c763:27b7 with SMTP id y9-20020a197509000000b00507c76327b7mr10462971lfe.40.1698222731573; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 01:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150-165-235.bredband.tele2.se. [188.150.165.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j16-20020a19f510000000b005079fbc44b3sm2453516lfb.48.2023.10.25.01.32.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 01:32:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273149 Archived-At: > 1. M-x lldb RET leads to errors. *Messages* contains: >=20 > error in process filter: gud-marker-filter: Text is read-only > error in process filter: Text is read-only Sorry, I don't observe this myself. > I think this can also be seen > when binding inhibit-read-only around the delete-region. That sounds strange. Did you bind inhibit-read-only to `t`? That should = have overridden any text protection. Unless I can reproduce it, I'm afraid you are left with the task to = debug it. > 2. Nitpick: when extracting the file name in the filter function, with >=20 > (group (+ (not (in "\n\r")))) ; 3: file >=20 > this means that file names cannot contain LF and CR, which they = actually > can. And that is a possibility that I'm going to ignore unless it's actually = a security problem (and I don't think it is). File names containing control characters on purpose are excessively rare = in Unix systems and disallowed on Windows (at least 0-31). > I guess the only thing a file name definitely cannot contain is > '/'. / is trivially allowed in path names; only NUL is disallowed. I'm not = sure to what extent we can trust LLDB to normalise line.file.fullpath.